For months now, I have been telling my students at the University of Southern California that one of their first duties as journalists will be to restore trust with audiences. Americans’ trust in the news media has dropped to a new low, and many of the other principles we teach journalism students will be less effective if they don’t have the basic attention and faith of the public. That focus has taken on new urgency in the wake of the 2016 presidential election, and I’ve been thinking more about concrete steps current and future journalists can take to repair the damaged relationship.
So let’s make 2017 the year of transparency. Show your work by explaining more of the reporting process to your audience. Be authentic by being more honest about what you know and what you don’t. It’s a small part of all things we can do, but it’s something we can do now — and frankly should have been doing all along.
Like many members of the media, I felt like I had the wind knocked out of me by the presidential election. I believed in the conventional wisdom that Hillary Clinton would win the presidency. Her loss in the face of our over-confident predictions did further damage to the media’s relationship with the public that we couldn’t afford.
Prior to the election cycle, there were already a lot of things journalists had done in recent years that erode the trust of audiences: making major changes to stories online without so much as an editor’s note, relying on clickbait in headlines and social media posts, teasing or confusing readers in push alerts. These may not seem like big problems, but fixing these bad habits by treating the audience with respect — human to human — can go a long way.
Something we’ve done a better job of in recent years is telling audiences “what we know and what we don’t” as a breaking news situation unfolds. While the process of producing real-time breaking news is somewhat unique, let’s adapt this approach to more types of reporting. We often try too hard to come up with a definitive-sounding conclusion instead of being honest and transparent both throughout the process and in the final product.
A notable exception to the media’s transparency problem this election cycle was The Washington Post’s David Fahrenthold, who showed his work on Twitter as he was reporting on Donald Trump’s charitable giving. And I was inspired by the approach to election-night calls that BuzzFeed’s Ben Smith outlined ahead of the organization’s live Twitter election broadcast (disclosure: I used to work for BuzzFeed). My favorite line: “We don’t believe that our audience is going to trust a news outlet because they’ve got dramatic music, great graphics, or great hair.”
I’m also encouraged by The New York Times’ approach to reporting in Oakland after the city’s devastating warehouse fire. Instead of just giving readers a sense of what they’ve been up to after much of the reporting has been done, they’re starting by establishing a relationship, a conversation while they’re there. Showing their work.
We’ve lost much of the public. The same old tactics won’t work to win them back. In 2017, try something new, taking inspiration from the examples above. Ask yourself why, in your personal life, you trust people. Is it because they talk down to you? Unlikely. It’s probably because you establish a relationship and are able to have genuine conversations.
The election was a wakeup call. We should capitalize on this moment and not fall back into bad habits. If not 2017, then when? I hope we do it now, because otherwise I fear it will be too late.
Laura E. Davis is assistant professor of professional practice at USC Annenberg.
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward
Lee Glendinning A call for great editing
Matt Waite The people running the media are the problem
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism
Eric Nuzum Podcasting stratifies into hard layers
Cory Haik Navigating power in Trump’s America
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach
Umbreen Bhatti A sense of journalists’ humanity
AX Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
Andrew Losowsky Building our own communities
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Laura Walker Authentic voices, not fake news
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
Alexis Lloyd Public trust for private realities
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
Tim Griggs The year we stop taking sides
Liz Danzico The triumph of the small
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Olivia Ma The year collaboration beats competition
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Taylor Lorenz “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
Corey Ford The year of the rebelpreneur
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
Molly de Aguiar Philanthropists galvanize around news
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
David Weigel A test for online speech
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
Doris Truong Connecting with diverse perspectives
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
Burt Herman Local news gets interesting
Sarah Wolozin Virtual reality on the open web
Javaun Moradi What can we own?
Ole Reißmann Un-faking the news
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Cindy Royal Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid
Richard Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Carrie Brown We won’t do enough
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
Andrew Ramsammy Rise of the rebel journalist
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
Bill Adair The year of the fact-checking bot
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Libby Bawcombe Kids board the podcast train
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
David Chavern Fake news gets solved
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
Andy Rossback The year of the user
Tim Herrera The safe space of service journalism
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
Hillary Frey Forests need to burn to regrow
Dannagal G. Young The return of the gatekeepers
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Dhiya Kuriakose The year of digital detoxing
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
Katie Zhu The year of minority media
Rachel Schallom Stop flying over the flyover states
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
Bill Keller A healthy skepticism about data
Geetika Rudra Journalism is community
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Mary Walter-Brown Getting comfortable asking for money