Esquire first published Gay Talese’s iconic profile of Joe DiMaggio in its July 1966 issue. The piece was “an evocative portrait of a great ballplayer long after his last game is over, and we have a powerful sense of his loneliness and his essential separation from almost everyone around him,” David Halberstam wrote in his foreword to The Best American Sports Writing of the Century, a collection he edited and in which he named Talese’s profile one of the four best sports stories of the 20th Century.
In fact, three of those four stories were originally published in Esquire — a testament to its legacy, as Halberstam wrote, as “the most exciting magazine in the country.” Another was the late Richard Ben Cramer’s 1986 profile of Ted Williams, in which Cramer managed to secure unique access to the reclusive Red Sox great.
Together, the two Esquire stories paint remarkable portraits of two of baseball’s all-time best players and fiercest rivals. So this month, when the Red Sox and Yankees prepared to meet for the first time this season, Esquire republished both stories together on Esquire Classics, a new website from Esquire that resurfaces some of the magazine’s best archival material with modern introductions and fresh artwork.
The standalone website launched in late March, with a twist: The full text of each story published on Esquire Classics is also sent out in a weekly email — the latest evidence that people’s inboxes are gaining appeal as a publishing platform.
Introducing @EsquireClassics: The essential Esquire, from 1933 to now. pic.twitter.com/lf4Iu9mqAO
— Esquire Classics (@EsquireClassics) March 27, 2015
The stories are meant to relate to anniversaries or other events in the news. There was an August 1968 article on the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. that coincided with the anniversary of his death on April 4. It also republished a 1968 profile of Elvis timed to the debut of The Elvis Experience in Las Vegas.
“We’re continuing our experiments with seeing what kinds of great archival stories people want to read and what formats seem to be most popular,” senior features editor Tyler Cabot, who leads Esquire Labs and is also a former Nieman fellow, told me in an email.
With a roster of contributors dating back to 1933 that includes Talese, Ernest Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Nora Ephron, and dozens of other notable writers, Esquire is well-suited to resurface stories from its archive.
Esquire, of course, isn’t the only legacy publication that’s taking advantage of archival material once accessible only via bound volumes or microfiche. Earlier this month, the Associated Press republished its original coverage of Abraham Lincoln’s assassination 150 years ago. (They buried the lede!)
April 1865: AP reporter waits until 10th paragraph of dispatch before elliptically confirming Abraham Lincoln is dead http://t.co/GVZ7x6AxhS
— Jon Swaine (@jonswaine) April 13, 2015
Gawker Media’s Deadspin has The Stacks, which republishes classic sports journalism originally published elsewhere. For its 125th anniversary last year, The Wall Street Journal published more than 300 archival articles. The New York Times runs a Twitter account, NYT Archives, that resurfaces archival content from the Times. It also runs First Glimpses, a series that examines the first time famous people or concepts appeared in the paper.
1944: The NYT discovers pizza http://t.co/OWOCBs0ABc pic.twitter.com/egrlLmo7go
— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 14, 2015
In the Times’ innovation report last year, its authors wrote that it needed to do a better job taking advantage its massive archives: “We can be both a daily newsletter and a library — offering news every day, as well as providing context, relevance and timeless works of journalism.”
Esquire has long mined its archives for material. For its 80th anniversary in 2013, the magazine partnered with Byliner to publish anthologies of some of its best stories. For its 75th anniversary, five years earlier, it published a list of its seven best stories and published many of them online in full. In 2009, it created a short-running podcast that featured old Esquire stories read aloud. And last fall, in honor of the anniversary of the September 11 attacks, it republished “The Falling Man,” Tom Junod’s 2003 story on a famous photo from 9/11. It suggested readers pay $2.99 for the story, with proceeds benefitting charity. (Though that story and another paywalled piece — a story by Chris Jones on astronaut Scott Kelly spending a year in space that was originally published last December — are now both available for free on Esquire Classics.)
Esquire Classics was built and is being edited by Aleszu Bajak, who teaches journalism at Northeastern University’s Media Innovation Program and previously partnered with Esquire as part of Story Lab, a course that reimagines how Esquire features are presented digitally.
Esquire also plans to use Esquire Classics to promote future stories. In its latest print issue, Esquire published the beginning of a story that it plans to print in full in its August issue, but in an email to subscribers, Esquire editor David Granger said the full piece would be posted on Esquire Classics. (Granger wrote that the article would be up last week, though it still has yet to be published.) [Update 4/27: The story was published this afternoon]
Esquire has done little to promote the launch of Esquire Classics aside from targeted emails like Granger’s and a handful of social media posts. As of this writing, it has 205 followers on Twitter and 43 Facebook likes.
Introducing @EsquireClassics http://t.co/p7XvgpEcWD pic.twitter.com/TJPk19fPh5
— Esquire Magazine (@Esquiremag) April 2, 2015
Cabot also wouldn’t go into specifics about the site or discuss Esquire’s plans for it, but there’s an archive section on the site promoting the Esquire Cover to Cover Archive featuring “Every issue. Every story. From 1933 to Forever” that it says is “coming soon.” And as of now, the site is free and there aren’t any ads running on it.
So while it remains to be seen how exactly Esquire will grow Esquire Classics, it’s likely we’ll see more pre-web publications take advantage of their archives as they continue to look for new ways to engage readers and draw traffic online.