2017 will be the year newsrooms find out who their audiences (actually) are.
The Internet is a complicated business tool. It can reduce millions of people to a singular identity, or amplify a single person’s unique voice to millions of people. An advertiser on Facebook can identify with great accuracy older males living in North America; a single vlogger can reach millions of faceless people on their YouTube channel. The two approaches to business development seem oppositional, but they’re actually two sides of the same coin: Successful business development models for online businesses cast a wide net, attracting a large number of people, and then figure out who those people are and what they care about. It’s this data that is monetized and constructs the backbone of online business models. The key to running a successful online business is being able to grow an audience to a mass scale while investing in learning about the same audience on a micro scale.
A newsroom that publishes its work on the Internet for profit is an online business. And here is where newsrooms enjoy the greatest advantage of all online businesses: Community is built in journalism’s DNA.
When we talk about developing business models and audiences, what we’re really talking about is building community. It’s in the reporter who lives in the same town she covers. It’s in the reporter who cultivates relationships with sources for many, many years. It’s in the production team that embeds itself with a military unit on the other side of the world. The common denominator is evident: Journalists working directly in their community, which serves as a place where journalism is both created and consumed.
The Internet has made this difficult. Journalists are farther than they have ever been from their communities. We cover events in places thousands of miles away, without ever leaving our desks. We interview sources we sometimes never meet in person. Sometimes we just paste together snippets of social media posted by people whose real identities we never confirm. Moreover, whatever we publish onto the Internet gets lost in the digital ether without ensuring that it reached not just a large enough audience, but the right audience.
All of this can be quickly labelled “bad journalism,” but these practices will not change unless the market pressures that enable them change.
So how do we get out of the disastrous state that journalism is in? As we near the end of 2016, it’s hard for me to not get bogged down in all the internal setbacks our industry has faced. We’ve failed to report on the concerns a significant number of Americans care about. These people now mistrust us, “the mainstream media,” and have turned to politicians and institutions that are not bound by truth but will very happily speak to them. We’ve failed to compete against information designed to get clicks, not to inform. Now the line between fake news and real news has been so badly blurred the average news consumer cannot tell the difference.
What do we do? We return to our community. Data analytics that have been mastered by companies like Facebook and Google will help us bridge the digital divide between journalists and the communities we serve. It’s imperative that when newsrooms partner with social media companies to distribute our work that we demand equal access to the data these companies collect on our audiences. It is also more important that newsrooms invest in creating in-house data teams designed to collect and analyze information that will help newsroom leaders answer the following questions:
This data is crucial for establishing the value of our audiences to potential advertisers and future sources of revenue. It is also crucial to ensuring that our work is accessible to the people who need it. And it is crucial to ensure that, as journalists, we are all doing our jobs. Journalism took a hard hit in 2016. Let’s return to our roots, and rebuild from the ground up.
Geetika Rudra is a data analyst at Dataminr.
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
Andrew Losowsky Building our own communities
Andy Rossback The year of the user
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Geetika Rudra Journalism is community
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Katie Zhu The year of minority media
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom
Hillary Frey Forests need to burn to regrow
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
Carrie Brown-Smith We won’t do enough
Bill Keller A healthy skepticism about data
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
Tim Herrera The safe space of service journalism
Ray Soto VR moves from experiments to immersion
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
Andrew Ramsammy Rise of the rebel journalist
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Molly de Aguiar Philanthropists galvanize around news
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
Libby Bawcombe Kids board the podcast train
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention
Burt Herman Local news gets interesting
Taylor Lorenz “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism
Tim Griggs The year we stop taking sides
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Dannagal G. Young The return of the gatekeepers
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Mary Walter-Brown Getting comfortable asking for money
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
Umbreen Bhatti A sense of journalists’ humanity
Javaun Moradi What can we own?
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
Olivia Ma The year collaboration beats competition
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
AX Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Megan H. Chan Cultural reporting goes mainstream
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
Rachel Schallom Stop flying over the flyover states
Corey Ford The year of the rebelpreneur
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
Eric Nuzum Podcasting stratifies into hard layers
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Alexis Lloyd Public trust for private realities
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Richard Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Tracie Powell Building reader relationships
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Doris Truong Connecting with diverse perspectives
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
Bill Adair The year of the fact-checking bot
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Mandy Velez The audience is the source and the story
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
Matt Waite The people running the media are the problem
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
David Weigel A test for online speech
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Laura Walker Authentic voices, not fake news
Liz Danzico The triumph of the small
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Cory Haik Navigating power in Trump’s America
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
Dhiya Kuriakose The year of digital detoxing
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
David Chavern Fake news gets solved
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication