Megan Lucero: We’ve been on what I’ve been calling a “sponge” trip; trying to absorb as much as I can from people in New York and D.C. This has been about absorbing and learning from as many people as we can who do slivers of things we want to incorporate.

Lucero: Because this has never existed, it helps when I approach people to give a little background. I was the data editor of the Times and Sunday Times of London for several years. My work there was about bringing new approaches to the newsroom, and by the end of it, it was about having a computational investigations team inside the newsroom. How do we bring tech into the way we approach journalism, doing it in a way that a human would never have been able to do previously?

The things I was focusing on were around how we’re living in a society where there’s more information than we could even imagine processing before. The digitization of information means that we cannot humanly, alone, process all that’s out there. With the new models and modes and business models of journalism, those things come in conflict with the cutting of resources and traditional means of reporting.

We needed a new approach. I started quite simply trying to work on these things within the Times investigations team and the newsroom, but then this project came up, which was about taking those ideas and applying them across all of the U.K.

What is the state of UK local media & tech? Help us answer some questions. Hackpad here > https://t.co/KjZ5trw8G6 #ddj #opendata

— Megan Lucero (@Megan_Lucero) March 20, 2017

The U.K. has a rich history of local journalism. But we’re recognizing that those local newsrooms don’t have the resources to take on all this new information, and also in general just to do journalism: A lot of local reporters I talk to have daily quotas for stories, and are starting to get put into their contracts the number of clicks they need to get per week. That isn’t conducive to journalism, let alone investigative journalism. So the main goal of The Bureau Local is public interest reporting and investigative journalism, and we’re trying to really focus that in the U.K., and on local journalism.

We want to create a network: Being able to combine journalists across the country with other people — whether that’s technologists, civic-minded people, designers — who want to help out. And then, opening data sets up for this community. That might be data sets that aren’t public, but in a lot of cases there’s data that is public but it’s not truly accessible. This might be something like a PDF release that’s difficult to process in a spreadsheet, and helping convert that over. For instance, the prescriptions database is a really great database, but it has four million rows of data, and if you’re a local reporter who maybe is only trained in Excel — Excel can’t open that amount of data. So without the right skills, you can’t access it.

Our final goal is, of course, to get investigative stories out on a local level from this.

We’re working with several official partners: Flourish, our data visualization partner, is going to be helping us provide data visualization tools for our network. We’re doing a summer internship with the Alan Turing Institute, so we get three computer scientists who are going to be helping us with projects this summer.

On the newsroom side, partnerships will be similar to the way The Bureau of Investigative Journalism currently works: The Bureau works on a story, approaches a news organization that it thinks is most aligned with it, and asks if they’d like to publish together. We’ll be working like that, and it can be with anyone from The Bristol Cable to the Ferret in Scotland.

One day we’d like to get to a point with how the Panama Papers worked. We’d take on a national dataset, and we’d work with journalists across the U.K. to help them tell investigative stories in their local areas. We don’t mind however many, and whoever wants to work with us; when there’s a big national story that also works with that, we’ll work with a national paper on it as well.

Lucero: We will. There are multiple levels of data literacy we’re working with. It’s not about going in to change anything, it’s about working within the way they already work. These journalists don’t have a lot of time.

We are going to be doing a road trip, going around the country and talking to people. We want to be informed by this community. What is a story that needs to be told? What is the data that’s difficult to get? What would make your life easier? We’ll try to find common threads there.

It might be identifying that, say, everybody’s been trying to report out specific police stop-and-search records, and they’re all finding that dataset really difficult, because it needs a lot of work cleaning, or additional FOI work to complete it. The projects we take on will need that sort of work.

It’s quite difficult to speak to people in the abstract, so we do also plan to prepare some data sets and some stories, and bring that to people to ask, is this of interest? Here’s an idea we thought would be interesting, we’ve been working hard on this investigation, do you want to be a part of helping us investigate it? In those cases, we’d approach journalists who are in line with that beat or topic.

Lucero: My experience at the Times does inform a lot of what we’re doing here. An editor or journalist might pitch something, and say, here’s this data set that’s really tricky, and we’d do some of the heavy lifting around that, and allow the journalism to happen.

The difference here is the work doesn’t just benefit a single newsroom. Developers and technologists are expensive, and these are expensive resources for one hit story. National papers really care about the big picture and the whole country, but I often find that they do the national picture and move on to something else. All that data and all that work would be beneficial to local reporters, if it was given to them in an accessible way. We want to look at how resources can be consolidated.

Lucero: Our goal is this. Say a lot of our reporters in the network are telling us something is a problem for them. We go in, find that it is a problem, and there are a lot of people who would benefit from a solution. When we decide it is worthwhile, we do the heavy lifting, and the idea would be to be able to offer it to the network. Once all the stories are broken, we’d want to make all of that data accessible to everyone.

Lucero: There’s a form on our site to sign up. That form is also for us to understand who’s interested. It can be for local journalists. But I’ve also had a lawyer, a human-centered design person, and people who run privacy and transparency groups reach out to me. We will see how that plays out, but we foresee arranging meetups according to locality and facilitating those. Maybe hack days, depending on when we need them.

And we’ll be building a platform as well that can allow for interaction and help, that can connect all these things together.

Lucero: My number-one story is the effect of Brexit on local communities. That’s a complicated one. There’s a reason why a lot of people didn’t know our connection to Europe and the value we got out of that. It’s really difficult. There are lots of different data sets around the structural funds, the Common Agricultural Policy — they’re in PDFs, they’re all over the place. I’d love to be able to empower communities across the country to identify what the funds were that they received, in what, for what. When policy decisions start to be made, when the government decides, say, we’re going to pay 60 percent of what the EU did for fisheries, that community can then calculate, what is 60 percent of what we got before?

That is going to be the story for the next several years — how this is going to ripple out across the country, and that is really going to affect local communities. It’s going to affect coastals. It’s going to affect those who had farming or fishery subsidies or research grants.

Whether I can get this done in the next two years is a question. I do need to build up that trust over time. I want to try to get out some first stories quickly, to start to build trust and start collaborations, so that when we do get to that really big story, we’ve got the things in place to make sure it can be done well.

Then, we want to look at local government. There are more mayoral elections and other local elections happening. There’s Northern Powerhouse support. Stories about things that affect people’s lives: transport stories, health stories about your local hospitals, things playing out with the National Health Service. Again, we want our community to inform what we work on; this is just what I’m thinking about right now.

Lucero: Our goal within the two years is to build up a network to open up more datasets and to get more local and investigative stories than there were previously.

The idea is to make this so crucial that we need to be around. We’re already looking at funders and funding models to help sustain this after two years. We’re already taking conversations with funders about the idea.

We have goals for this to one day be a model for people to replicate themselves in other cities, other countries, other topic areas.

I’ve outlined the goals of what we want to accomplish, but this isn’t prescriptive. This will only be successful if we’re responsive to the community. If it starts to be dictated too much from some group out of London, it’s just not going to work. That’s…in a way how Brexit happened. This is about flipping all of that. It’s attempting a new model. Right now, we’re at a stage where we first need to hear from the community.