In 2017, I certainly wouldn’t have predicted the term “fake news” would become so stretched and contorted as to render it utterly meaningless, much less weaponized by world leaders. I wouldn’t have predicted so little concrete action had been taken to mitigate information pollution globally. I also wouldn’t have predicted the scale of coordinated media and platform manipulation.
So with these caveats, here are my predictions for 2018, and some suggestions for remedying the problem that I wish I could predict to happen.
The term “f*** news” will continue to be peppered into news articles, used by editors who claim SEO leaves them no choice, and added to academic articles by researchers riding a trend in hopes for more grant money. It will appear in government inquiries that want to seem relevant, and will continue to be weaponized by politicians wanting to undermine the media and, ultimately, free speech.
I wish I could predict that in 2018 most people would use more nuanced terms to describe different types of mis- and disinformation.
Visual disinformation will become much more prevalent, partly because agents of disinformation will recognize its power to instantly fire up emotions, evade tripping critical engagement from the brain, and be consumed directly from the News Feed. Visuals are also much harder to monitor and analyze computationally.
Technology companies are working on solutions to these challenges, and I wish I could predict that this subject would become a global research and technological priority so we might have a comprehensive solution to visual disinformation in the next twelve months.
Computational techniques that allow realistic audio, still images, and video to be automatically manipulated or created are just in its infancy, but reporting on these technologies will begin to have a significant impact on people’s trust in audio and visual evidence. Politicians will claim negative clips of them were manipulated or fabricated. We won’t see a major successful hoax using this technology in 2018. But despite that, we will spend a lot of time writing about it, raising fear and potentially jeopardizing people’s trust in audio and visual materials.
I wish I could predict fewer of these types of stories.
Techniques to manipulate platforms and the media will become much more sophisticated. There will not be enough engineers at the technology companies, nor enough reporters at news organizations, assigned to monitor these techniques. Most senior staff will continue to lack a serious understanding of how these systematic disinformation campaigns are damaging their respective industries.
I wish I could predict that technology companies and news organizations would begin to share “intelligence,” becoming much more aware of the consequences of publishing, linking to, or in any way amplifying mis- and disinformation.
Though media companies may not effectively combat disinformation, they will continue to report about disinformation and use headlines with terms like bots, Russia, cybersecurity, hacking, and fake news to generate traffic. Though the news industry will continue to use these terms, it will not explain them responsibly. Moreover, senior editors will not consider how these terms might affect the public’s trust in democratic systems and the media itself. The race for clicks may have some unintended consequences at the ballot box in elections.
I wish I could predict more nuanced reporting on disinformation that has considered the potential unintended consequences of these types of stories.
Governments around the world will continue to hold “fake news” inquiries, and some will pass knee-jerk, ill-informed regulation that will do little — or worse, suppress free speech. If a European government passes a well-intentioned law, a regime far away will use the precedent to pass similar legislation aiming to stifle what it decides is “fake news.”
I wish I could predict a truly global, regulatory conversation which recognises the cultural, legal, and ethical complexities of dealing with mis- and disinformation.
Most governments will continue to work independently on information literacy programs, despite the fact that a truly global response to this problem is required. Programs will not fully incorporate materials on the impact of big data, algorithmic power, ethical considerations of publishing or sharing information, or emotional skepticism. The programs will not be future-proofed, as they will not adequately focus on making sense of information in augmented and virtual reality environments.
I wish I could predict a global coalition bringing together the smartest minds, along with the best content creators from all companies from Netflix to Snapchat, to create information “literacy” content of global relevance.
Philanthropic organizations will continue to give relatively small grants to independent projects, meaning the scale and global nature of this problem will not be adequately addressed.
I wish I could predict the creation of a significant global fund that is supported by money donated by governments, the technology companies, and philanthropists, and is managed by a coalition of organizations and advisors.
Closed messaging apps will become even more prevalent than they are today (which is already significant in a number of countries in Latin America and Asia-Pacific). We will continue to be blind to what is being shared and will therefore be ill-equipped to debunk rumours and fabricated content spreading on these platforms.
I wish I could predict that there would be a significant, new focus on studying these apps, and testing experimental methods for effectively slowing down the sharing of mis- and disinformation on them.
Anger at technology companies will continue to rise. Consequently, platforms will be less likely to collaborate.
I wish I could predict that there would be greater moves towards transparency that involves greater data sharing, independent auditing, and collaborations with trusted academic partners.
I am unapologetic about the depressing nature of these predictions. We’re in a terrifying moment where our global information streams are polluted with a dizzying array of mis- and disinformation. Politicians are targeting the professional media as a way of building direct connections with citizens through social media. Journalists and platforms are being targeted and manipulated by agents of disinformation who crave and require the credibility that comes with their exposure. Political polarization is creating dangerous schisms in societies worldwide, and the speed of technological advancements is making manipulation increasingly difficult to detect. These are all reasons to be depressed.
It doesn’t have to be this dire. As outlined here, if everything I wish I could predict actually happens, we might have a fighting chance. I would love to be proved wrong.
Claire Wardle is strategy and research director of First Draft News and a research fellow at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard Kennedy School.
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Carrie Brown Transparency finally takes off
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
AX Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Nik Usher The year of The Washington Post
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism