Truth will be the big casualty of 2020 as the U.S. presidential elections follow the 2016 campaign and the 2019 British general election in reframing the lie as the center of political discourse. Lies and the gall with which they are deployed have been normalized.
I have been thinking often lately of the philosopher and writer Hannah Arendt and her warning nearly 70 years ago as to how fascism took hold: “In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true…”
I don’t believe journalism is faring well against the tidal wave of misinformation we face from our elected politicians.
In the United States, we have been disintermediated by a president who understood Twitter instinctively and uses it to set the agenda which mainstream media feels compelled to follow. In the United Kingdom, a government that won on a raft of lies has made clear it intends to weaken the central role the BBC plays in the national news debate.
Journalists seldom set the agenda in political reporting — though that role is arguably still strong in financial journalism, where The Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times achieved ground-breaking exposés from Goldman Sachs and 1MDB to Wirecard.
It is a strange phenomenon that the death of truth in political discourse is matched by a loss of trust in media. Never has media been more effective at fact-checking, data journalism, FOIA requests, and fast and thoughtful correction of errors. Recent excellent FOIA work by the Center for Public Integrity, exposing the evidence of the quid pro quo on Ukraine, is a great example of pure reportage and the use of tools like FOIA.
Yet trust dwindles. I regret I don’t have good answers to that problem other than redoubling efforts on core news reporting and working much harder to distinguish news from opinion. I believe the blending of opinion and commentary with news — particularly as a design issue on smaller devices and in Facebook — is a serious drain on journalistic credibility.
There are flickers of optimism: Bellingcat has exposed Russian espionage actions, war crimes in Syria, and much else based on dogged reporting. ProPublica has won support to expand its methods into regional and local reporting. Rappler still stands in the Philippines. Newsroom.co.nz in New Zealand demonstrates that new business models might work.
Despite that effort and the enormous investment in fact-checking organizations to catch out sloppy reporting and even sloppier politicians, I don’t believe we are winning the battle to reclaim trust. Maybe it is an essential component of a journey to re-establish the confidence of the general public, but right now I am not optimistic.
And to go back to the beginning, we need to ask who benefits from this lack of trust in journalism and the very idea of truth. It is a tactic as old as the Tsarist secret police, perfected in Russia under communism and deployed globally under Putin. It’s no accident that academic and journalist Peter Pomerantsev’s first book, about the wild days of journalism in Russia, was called Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible.
Peter Bale is a London-based media consultant, former president of the Global Editors Network, and former CEO of the Center for Public Integrity.
Truth will be the big casualty of 2020 as the U.S. presidential elections follow the 2016 campaign and the 2019 British general election in reframing the lie as the center of political discourse. Lies and the gall with which they are deployed have been normalized.
I have been thinking often lately of the philosopher and writer Hannah Arendt and her warning nearly 70 years ago as to how fascism took hold: “In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true…”
I don’t believe journalism is faring well against the tidal wave of misinformation we face from our elected politicians.
In the United States, we have been disintermediated by a president who understood Twitter instinctively and uses it to set the agenda which mainstream media feels compelled to follow. In the United Kingdom, a government that won on a raft of lies has made clear it intends to weaken the central role the BBC plays in the national news debate.
Journalists seldom set the agenda in political reporting — though that role is arguably still strong in financial journalism, where The Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times achieved ground-breaking exposés from Goldman Sachs and 1MDB to Wirecard.
It is a strange phenomenon that the death of truth in political discourse is matched by a loss of trust in media. Never has media been more effective at fact-checking, data journalism, FOIA requests, and fast and thoughtful correction of errors. Recent excellent FOIA work by the Center for Public Integrity, exposing the evidence of the quid pro quo on Ukraine, is a great example of pure reportage and the use of tools like FOIA.
Yet trust dwindles. I regret I don’t have good answers to that problem other than redoubling efforts on core news reporting and working much harder to distinguish news from opinion. I believe the blending of opinion and commentary with news — particularly as a design issue on smaller devices and in Facebook — is a serious drain on journalistic credibility.
There are flickers of optimism: Bellingcat has exposed Russian espionage actions, war crimes in Syria, and much else based on dogged reporting. ProPublica has won support to expand its methods into regional and local reporting. Rappler still stands in the Philippines. Newsroom.co.nz in New Zealand demonstrates that new business models might work.
Despite that effort and the enormous investment in fact-checking organizations to catch out sloppy reporting and even sloppier politicians, I don’t believe we are winning the battle to reclaim trust. Maybe it is an essential component of a journey to re-establish the confidence of the general public, but right now I am not optimistic.
And to go back to the beginning, we need to ask who benefits from this lack of trust in journalism and the very idea of truth. It is a tactic as old as the Tsarist secret police, perfected in Russia under communism and deployed globally under Putin. It’s no accident that academic and journalist Peter Pomerantsev’s first book, about the wild days of journalism in Russia, was called Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible.
Peter Bale is a London-based media consultant, former president of the Global Editors Network, and former CEO of the Center for Public Integrity.
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
AX Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Mario García Think small (screen)
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd