Opportunities for young journalists aren’t created equal, and U.S. media internships are fraught with inequity.
Internships have multiple barriers to entry. “Prestige” newsrooms usually require previous internship experience. That doesn’t necessarily account for comparable experience gained from student media, or even self-published work with an engaged audience. Students often produce their work with few resources beyond peers who might have a semester or two more experience. Yet they meet deadlines, break stories, and keep their communities informed.
Who can afford to take an internship? The deck is stacked against anyone who might not be able to move across the country for eight to 12 weeks of work, sometimes for pay that’s barely above minimum wage.
Some news organizations say they offer college credit. That’s a trap. It costs money to claim that college credit — so the internship isn’t just unpaid, it makes the student find cash for the privilege of a summer of unpaid labor.
The deck is also stacked against people who don’t have a solid foundation in journalism basics. Our industry has no pipeline for attracting people if they aren’t at a college or university.
An overwhelming majority of journalists have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared with one-third of American adults. Like attracts like, and this comes at the expense of our newsrooms not reflecting the communities we’re supposed to serve. We need more people of color in newsrooms — particularly in leadership positions — but we also need more military veterans and disabled journalists.
Instead of reinforcing a cycle that selects people who already have advantages, internships should focus on providing real-world journalism experience and career coaching. More can be done to ensure that people from a variety of backgrounds have equitable opportunities.
Cities with at least two news organizations will see the value in pooling resources to provide affordable — or free — housing for interns. Local news is best done by people embedded in the community. And a key skill for journalists is learning to quickly establish rapport with sources. So internships in an unfamiliar part of the country will broaden a young journalist’s horizons, offer them lessons to quickly learn what’s important to their short-term neighbors, and allow them to bring an outsider’s perspective to the newsroom.
Poynter adjunct Kathy Lu has an idea that would upend the system: allowing places with the most resources to train journalists who would then be poised for success in smaller markets.
The internship process is set up like sports franchises. Your local papers are the farm teams, and they nurture the talent — some of whom make it to the big leagues.
But that system was set up back when most newsrooms (and I’m mostly talking about newspapers) were flush with resources — offices that have a 20-person team now once had over 100 — and news deserts didn’t exist.
It was a system set up to eventually benefit the larger, dominant newsrooms (a colonialist move), who get to pay intern wages to hard-working reporters who have already had several summers of experience.
This isn’t to say people can’t have an ambition to work at these important institutions of record. It’s to ask: Why is the pipeline one-directional? Why aren’t the larger newsrooms with more resources also helping supply talent to the smaller ones? Why isn’t there a program to train journalists to become bad-ass reporters and writers for local media?
I absolutely love the idea of inverting the talent pipeline. It puts the organizations with the most resources — including an abundance of experienced journalists who can be mentors — in the position to nurture promising young journalists who will thrive because of the attention paid to their development in those crucial internship weeks.
To grow talent, news organizations need to invest in creating fertile ground for emerging journalists to do their best — and to make occasional mistakes. But those mistakes should not include entering the workforce underpaid and with a mountain of student loans.
Doris Truong is director of training and diversity at The Poynter Institute.
Opportunities for young journalists aren’t created equal, and U.S. media internships are fraught with inequity.
Internships have multiple barriers to entry. “Prestige” newsrooms usually require previous internship experience. That doesn’t necessarily account for comparable experience gained from student media, or even self-published work with an engaged audience. Students often produce their work with few resources beyond peers who might have a semester or two more experience. Yet they meet deadlines, break stories, and keep their communities informed.
Who can afford to take an internship? The deck is stacked against anyone who might not be able to move across the country for eight to 12 weeks of work, sometimes for pay that’s barely above minimum wage.
Some news organizations say they offer college credit. That’s a trap. It costs money to claim that college credit — so the internship isn’t just unpaid, it makes the student find cash for the privilege of a summer of unpaid labor.
The deck is also stacked against people who don’t have a solid foundation in journalism basics. Our industry has no pipeline for attracting people if they aren’t at a college or university.
An overwhelming majority of journalists have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared with one-third of American adults. Like attracts like, and this comes at the expense of our newsrooms not reflecting the communities we’re supposed to serve. We need more people of color in newsrooms — particularly in leadership positions — but we also need more military veterans and disabled journalists.
Instead of reinforcing a cycle that selects people who already have advantages, internships should focus on providing real-world journalism experience and career coaching. More can be done to ensure that people from a variety of backgrounds have equitable opportunities.
Cities with at least two news organizations will see the value in pooling resources to provide affordable — or free — housing for interns. Local news is best done by people embedded in the community. And a key skill for journalists is learning to quickly establish rapport with sources. So internships in an unfamiliar part of the country will broaden a young journalist’s horizons, offer them lessons to quickly learn what’s important to their short-term neighbors, and allow them to bring an outsider’s perspective to the newsroom.
Poynter adjunct Kathy Lu has an idea that would upend the system: allowing places with the most resources to train journalists who would then be poised for success in smaller markets.
The internship process is set up like sports franchises. Your local papers are the farm teams, and they nurture the talent — some of whom make it to the big leagues.
But that system was set up back when most newsrooms (and I’m mostly talking about newspapers) were flush with resources — offices that have a 20-person team now once had over 100 — and news deserts didn’t exist.
It was a system set up to eventually benefit the larger, dominant newsrooms (a colonialist move), who get to pay intern wages to hard-working reporters who have already had several summers of experience.
This isn’t to say people can’t have an ambition to work at these important institutions of record. It’s to ask: Why is the pipeline one-directional? Why aren’t the larger newsrooms with more resources also helping supply talent to the smaller ones? Why isn’t there a program to train journalists to become bad-ass reporters and writers for local media?
I absolutely love the idea of inverting the talent pipeline. It puts the organizations with the most resources — including an abundance of experienced journalists who can be mentors — in the position to nurture promising young journalists who will thrive because of the attention paid to their development in those crucial internship weeks.
To grow talent, news organizations need to invest in creating fertile ground for emerging journalists to do their best — and to make occasional mistakes. But those mistakes should not include entering the workforce underpaid and with a mountain of student loans.
Doris Truong is director of training and diversity at The Poynter Institute.
AX Mina
Jody Brannon
Anthony Nadler
Joanne McNeil
Shannon McGregor Carolyn Schmitt
Meena Thiruvengadam
Melody Kramer
Moreno Cruz Osório
Millie Tran
Stephen Fowler
Larry Ryckman
Ariel Zirulnick
Kathleen Searles Rebekah Trumble
Tamar Charney
Kristen Jeffers
Mary Walter-Brown
Jennifer Coogan
Eric Nuzum
Doris Truong
Anita Varma
Chase Davis
Shalabh Upadhyay
Burt Herman
Natalia Viana
Alice Antheaume
Catalina Albeanu
Cindy Royal
Parker Molloy
Raney Aronson-Rath
Victor Pickard
Jennifer Brandel
Chicas Poderosas
Sarah Marshall
Kendra Pierre-Louis
Jesenia De Moya Correa
Tom Trewinnard
Cherian George
Rachel Glickhouse
James Salanga
S. Mitra Kalita
Richard Tofel
David Skok
Joni Deutsch
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
Joy Mayer
Gabe Schneider
Stefanie Murray
Izabella Kaminska
Joshua P. Darr
Joe Amditis
Matthew Pressman
Jim Friedlich
Candace Amos
Zizi Papacharissi
Kerri Hoffman
Jessica Clark
Michael W. Wagner
Anika Anand
Christoph Mergerson
Gordon Crovitz
Julia Munslow
David Cohn
Francesco Zaffarano
Nikki Usher
Daniel Eilemberg
Whitney Phillips
Mandy Jenkins
Matt DeRienzo
Julia Angwin
Wilson Liévano
Gonzalo del Peon
Laxmi Parthasarathy
j. Siguru Wahutu
Sarah Stonbely
Errin Haines
Jesse Holcomb
Robert Hernandez
Mario García
Megan McCarthy
Paul Cheung
John Davidow
Simon Allison
Amy Schmitz Weiss
Ståle Grut
Andrew Freedman
Christina Shih
Don Day
A.J. Bauer
Tony Baranowski
Amara Aguilar
Matt Karolian
Mike Rispoli
Jonas Kaiser
Sam Guzik
Brian Moritz
Cristina Tardáguila
Simon Galperin
Juleyka Lantigua
James Green
Kristen Muller