I heard this recently and can’t get it out of my head: “Although many of us may think of ourselves as thinking creatures that feel, biologically we are feeling creatures that think.”
It’s from Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor, a neuroscientist who wrote My Stroke of Insight: A Brain Scientist’s Personal Journey.
It’s been stuck in my head because as someone who delivers diversity, equity, and inclusion training to news organizations and has been involved in a range of newsroom diversity initiatives, I think this is a missing piece of the puzzle.
Creating diverse, inclusive, welcoming workplaces is not about numbers; it’s about emotions. Namely: How we handle our own.
We have plenty of proof that it’s clearly not enough to just hire for diversity. Despite decades of talk and stop-and-go committees and studies, thousands of journalists say their newsrooms don’t have enough diversity in race and ethnicity. Newsrooms are quite resistant to even reporting their demographics, as the News Leaders Association encountered earlier this year.
Because once you hire that person for their perspectives and experiences, do you know how their ideas and authenticity will be received, emotionally?
For instance:
If the answer to any of the above is no, know that it is not about your new employee, but about a culture that diminishes feelings.
The key is to pause and examine that defensive reaction for what that feeling really is, instead of acting on it. We won’t succeed every time, but if we don’t even try, we are creating a toxic workplace.
According to an MIT Sloan Management Review study released this year, the top five toxic workplace traits are: “noninclusive,” “disrespectful,” “unethical,” “cutthroat,” and “abusive.”
When I see those words, I see a culture that has no empathy for the human experience.
While I am thankful I worked with supportive colleagues in non-toxic newsrooms, I needed more guidance around handling emotions and people’s reactions to them — I, who prided herself in being a not-too-emotional person.
I’ve had colleagues report other colleagues for being too emotional in the newsroom. I’ve managed reporters who told me they weren’t comfortable talking to previous bosses about their mental wellness. I’ve witnessed microaggressions and failed to know how to handle it well.
And this is not healthy — for anyone.
It contributes to a psychologically unsafe workplace. And good luck trying to retain a new employee in such a culture.
To be able to create the places of belonging I hear so many newsrooms striving for, we need to be there for one another emotionally. Part of being human is to feel, so asking people to be authentic means asking them to be emotional.
To create truly inclusive workplaces means you have to be able to confront your own reactions to emotions.
Because how can you navigate people through burnout, stress, covering trauma, systemic racism, and difficult change without reflecting on your emotional response?
Why does seeing someone cry make you uncomfortable? How often do you ask your colleague how they’re feeling, and are you prepared for the answer? Can you hold space for someone’s anger at work in a way that preserves safety for yourself and others?
This is why I predict in 2023, DEI training for newsrooms will also include reflections on our emotional agility. I believe newsrooms who succeed in hiring and retaining a diverse staff will also be places where people can be their emotional selves without fear.
And we need it now more than ever as we’re confronting a collision of challenges: working and living through a pandemic, waves of layoffs and cutbacks, a vein of public distrust of the media, a steady stream of coverage about suffering, pain and loss.
As psychologist Susan David notes in Brené Brown’s latest book Atlas of the Heart, emotions “can be beacons, not barriers, helping us identify what we most care about and motivating us to make positive changes.”
All the DEI mission statements and training launched in the past few years will not lead to positive changes unless we also recognize and hold space for the feelings within us. It requires us to admit that something makes us sad, scared, overwhelmed, or ashamed. And it is in working through these emotions that we can create truly inclusive places.
Kathy Lu is an adjunct at The Poynter Institute and founder of Audiencibility, a media consulting company.
I heard this recently and can’t get it out of my head: “Although many of us may think of ourselves as thinking creatures that feel, biologically we are feeling creatures that think.”
It’s from Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor, a neuroscientist who wrote My Stroke of Insight: A Brain Scientist’s Personal Journey.
It’s been stuck in my head because as someone who delivers diversity, equity, and inclusion training to news organizations and has been involved in a range of newsroom diversity initiatives, I think this is a missing piece of the puzzle.
Creating diverse, inclusive, welcoming workplaces is not about numbers; it’s about emotions. Namely: How we handle our own.
We have plenty of proof that it’s clearly not enough to just hire for diversity. Despite decades of talk and stop-and-go committees and studies, thousands of journalists say their newsrooms don’t have enough diversity in race and ethnicity. Newsrooms are quite resistant to even reporting their demographics, as the News Leaders Association encountered earlier this year.
Because once you hire that person for their perspectives and experiences, do you know how their ideas and authenticity will be received, emotionally?
For instance:
If the answer to any of the above is no, know that it is not about your new employee, but about a culture that diminishes feelings.
The key is to pause and examine that defensive reaction for what that feeling really is, instead of acting on it. We won’t succeed every time, but if we don’t even try, we are creating a toxic workplace.
According to an MIT Sloan Management Review study released this year, the top five toxic workplace traits are: “noninclusive,” “disrespectful,” “unethical,” “cutthroat,” and “abusive.”
When I see those words, I see a culture that has no empathy for the human experience.
While I am thankful I worked with supportive colleagues in non-toxic newsrooms, I needed more guidance around handling emotions and people’s reactions to them — I, who prided herself in being a not-too-emotional person.
I’ve had colleagues report other colleagues for being too emotional in the newsroom. I’ve managed reporters who told me they weren’t comfortable talking to previous bosses about their mental wellness. I’ve witnessed microaggressions and failed to know how to handle it well.
And this is not healthy — for anyone.
It contributes to a psychologically unsafe workplace. And good luck trying to retain a new employee in such a culture.
To be able to create the places of belonging I hear so many newsrooms striving for, we need to be there for one another emotionally. Part of being human is to feel, so asking people to be authentic means asking them to be emotional.
To create truly inclusive workplaces means you have to be able to confront your own reactions to emotions.
Because how can you navigate people through burnout, stress, covering trauma, systemic racism, and difficult change without reflecting on your emotional response?
Why does seeing someone cry make you uncomfortable? How often do you ask your colleague how they’re feeling, and are you prepared for the answer? Can you hold space for someone’s anger at work in a way that preserves safety for yourself and others?
This is why I predict in 2023, DEI training for newsrooms will also include reflections on our emotional agility. I believe newsrooms who succeed in hiring and retaining a diverse staff will also be places where people can be their emotional selves without fear.
And we need it now more than ever as we’re confronting a collision of challenges: working and living through a pandemic, waves of layoffs and cutbacks, a vein of public distrust of the media, a steady stream of coverage about suffering, pain and loss.
As psychologist Susan David notes in Brené Brown’s latest book Atlas of the Heart, emotions “can be beacons, not barriers, helping us identify what we most care about and motivating us to make positive changes.”
All the DEI mission statements and training launched in the past few years will not lead to positive changes unless we also recognize and hold space for the feelings within us. It requires us to admit that something makes us sad, scared, overwhelmed, or ashamed. And it is in working through these emotions that we can create truly inclusive places.
Kathy Lu is an adjunct at The Poynter Institute and founder of Audiencibility, a media consulting company.
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
James Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.