• Fellowships
  • Reports
  • Lab
  • Storyboard
    • Nieman Foundation at Harvard
    HOME
    About
    Subscribe
    Archives
              
    Foundation
    Reports
    Storyboard
    LATEST STORY
    Lessons learned in The Building of Lost Causes
    Business Models Mobile & Apps Audience & Social Aggregation & Discovery Reporting & Production
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Jan. 12, 2023, 10:09 a.m.
    Business Models
    The Minneapolis Star Tribune found that allowing online cancellation actually helps keep subscribers
    LINK: wan-ifra.org  ➚   |   Posted by: Laura Hazard Owen   |   January 12, 2023

    RELATED ARTICLE
    FTC: Let digital subscribers click to cancel. Newspapers: Hey, not so fast.
    December 1, 2021
    Many news organizations and other companies have been highly reluctant to let users cancel their subscriptions online, despite FTC pressure and the fact that people haaaaate talking to customer service.

    But what if refusing to allow subscribers to cancel online is not only annoying, but also actually counterproductive?1

    The Minneapolis Star Tribune is working to hold on to subscribers with a position focused solely on subscriber retention, WAN-IFRA noted Thursday. One counterintuitive way to do that, the Star Tribune found, is to give subscribers the option to cancel online.

    Toby Collodora joined the Star Tribune in 2019 as its first senior manager of retention and engagement. The paper now has 100,000 digital subscribers. “Our goal is discuss retention as often as we discuss acquisition,” she said at WAN-IFRA’s World News Media Congress last fall.

    Perhaps surprisingly, the Star Tribune found that allowing online cancellation, as it started doing in December 2021, hasn’t resulted in more cancellations. Instead, it may actually be helping the paper keep more of its subscribers who are on the fence. The Star Tribune’s “total online save rate” is 18.5%, while the “call center save rate” — where you have to talk to a person who tries to persuade you to stay — is only 8.8%.

    While allowing online cancellation initially raised some concerns that more people might cancel, Collodora said they’ve implemented a low-tech solution where users enter in some simple information, such as their name, email address and answer a short series of questions to help identify what kind of subscription they have.

    “That information is then used to present an offer, sometimes it’s a price-based offer, sometimes it’s a different offer such as somebody is experiencing a problem with their digital account, we offer that somebody will give them a call back or send them an email to try to resolve that technical problem, and then of course that entices that person to retain their subscription with us,” she said.

    The best indicator that a subscriber will stick around, the Star Tribune has found, is when they renew for the first time:

    While Collodora is the person in charge of Star Tribune’s retention efforts, she said they also spend time talking about how retention is part of the job of everyone who works for the company.

    For example, she said, “we talk about what each person in the organization can do to get a subscriber to make that first renewal payment. That’s really something we focus on because once a person makes their first renewal payment, they are far more likely to retain. It’s our single best indicator.”

    You can read the full post about the panel here.

    1. In fact, our 2021 survey on cancellations suggested that this might be the case. “Oppressive cancellation policy that requires calling customer support to cancel,” one respondent wrote to explain why they canceled their subscription to the Chicago Tribune. [↩]
    Show tags
     
    What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
    Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
    Prefer a once-a-week email? »
    The latest from Nieman Lab
    Lessons learned in The Building of Lost Causes
    Linda Solomon Wood
    Publishers find the AI era not all that lucrative
    Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
    Embrace the barbell
    Millie Tran
    Prediction markets go mainstream
    Taylor Lorenz
    The rise of informal news networks
    Heather Chaplin
    Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Lessons learned in The Building of Lost Causes
    “The skills we developed while facing down the fossil fuel industry — persistence through trolling campaigns, converting readers one by one, turning an upstart publication into essential reading — these aren’t just about journalism. They’re about how to keep building when everything around you feels like it’s crumbling.”
    Publishers find the AI era not all that lucrative
    “Welcome, surely. Lucrative, in a sense. Game changer? Hardly.”
    Embrace the barbell
    “It’s time to abandon middling stories and go very short or very long.”
    Help advance the Nieman Foundation’s mission “to promote and elevate the standards of journalism” by making a donation.

    To promote and elevate the standards of journalism

    Covering thought leadership in journalism

    Pushing to the future of journalism

    Exploring the art and craft of story
    © 2024 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College  /  Some rights reserved
    Harvard Trademark Privacy Digital Accessibility
    Walter Lippmann House    One Francis Ave.    Cambridge, MA 02138    617 495 2237