Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
There’s another reason the L.A. Times’ AI-generated opinion ratings are bad (this one doesn’t involve the Klan)
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 19, 2025, 12:28 p.m.
LINK: www.nytimes.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Laura Hazard Owen   |   March 19, 2025

When ABC shut down FiveThirtyEight early this month, the site’s publicly available polling databases — like a presidential approval rating tracker — shut down, too. Many news outlets, including The New York Times and FiveThirtyEight founder Nate Silver’s Silver Bulletin, had relied on the data for election coverage, and people worried about its disappearance.

“Collecting and maintaining a database of public polls is a lot of work, requiring diligence, meticulousness, and dealing with constant complaints about edge cases from readers and pollsters,” Silver wrote. “But it’s also a public service. Polling has its challenges, but I believe it’s vital in a democracy.”

Luckily, the data has been saved: The New York Times is picking up where FiveThirtyEight left off and has “begun a new effort to track public opinion surveys, starting by collecting all polls on President Trump’s job approval…building on the work of the politics website 538,” William P. Davis, the Times’ director of election data analytics, wrote Monday.

Our goal is to ensure that this resource, which is a foundational tool for many journalists and researchers, remains updated long-term. The data will be made available free for anybody to use as they wish, so long as they provide attribution to The Times. (If you’re still using data collected by 538, you may still need to give it attribution as well.)

To make the transition as easy as possible, we are providing the data in about the same format as 538 did. There are some differences, which are noted at the bottom of this page.

You can see the Times’ polling tracker here.

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
There’s another reason the L.A. Times’ AI-generated opinion ratings are bad (this one doesn’t involve the Klan)
At a time of increasing polarization and rigid ideologies, the L.A. Times has decided it wants to make its opinion pieces less persuasive to readers by increasing the cost of changing your mind.
The NBA’s next big insider may be an outsider
While insiders typically work for established media companies like ESPN, Jake Fischer operates out of his Brooklyn apartment and publishes scoops behind a paywall on Substack. It’s not even his own Substack.
Wired’s un-paywalling of stories built on public data is a reminder of its role in the information ecosystem
Trump’s wholesale destruction of the information-generating sectors of the federal government will have implications that go far beyond .gov domains.