Two years ago, for a research project I was working on, I talked to journalists about the ways user-generated content was handled in their newsrooms. During one interview, an editor actually recreated the groan that went around the news meetings whenever she brought up the “v-word.” She was talking about verification. As we stumble towards the end of 2016, with everyone obsessing over misinformation, I don’t think you’d find any newsroom referring to verification in this way. I would hope not, anyway.
I predict newsrooms will make social discovery and verification skills something they specifically seek in new hires in 2017. This is not the time to be fooled by a photoshopped image, mistaken when a video emerges with fake BBC branding, or crediting the wrong person on screen because an image emerged on Twitter when it actually originated in a WhatsApp group and was captured by someone completely different.
The misinformation ecosystem is much more nuanced than simply fake news. Over the weekend, I saw the inevitable backlash against the term “fake news.” But as Alexios Mantzarlis of Poynter’s International Fact-Checking Network pointed out on Twitter: “the fact that so many are misusing the term ‘fake news’ doesn’t mean it’s not a thing at all.” We need to agree a taxonomy to explain the complexities of the misinformation ecosystem. Until we do that, our attempts at finding solutions are becoming circular.
As I explained in a recent piece for CJR, during this U.S. election I counted six different, but specific types of misinformation, from “real” content used in the wrong context, to photoshopped images, to video content using branding from mainstream media, to parody content. The full spectrum of misinformation is much broader and I predict we’ll see work to create a definitive typology so we can have a shared understanding of what we mean when we use different terms.
Eliot Higgins of Bellingcat has already shown what is possible when social discovery and verification techniques are applied on long-form investigative questions. The work of Eliot and his team to investigate the downing of flight MH17 using clues that emerged on social media demonstrated what is possible.
ProPublica’s Electionland project, an initiative with which First Draft was directly involved, also demonstrated what is possible. With an army of 660 students at 14 journalism schools, all trained in social verification techniques, we were able to find and corroborate over 1,000 reports which emerged on social media during election day.
We hope to use similar methodologies to monitor the French election in the runup to the April polling day, and are in the planning stages of a project to map hate crimes in the U.S. and to monitor the German election as well.
We often take the blue verification tick for granted, but one day it became the way we judged the quality of an account across different social networks. It’s an example of an accepted visual grammar. As the arguments swirl about fake news and the misinformation ecosystem, and as social networks push back on the idea that they will ever be the arbiters of truth, the inevitable next step, I hope, is that we will see visual cues on content that will allow users to navigate the content they discover via the social web themselves. These visual cues would allow a new level of transparency around content: for example, allowing users to judge how long a piece of content has been circulating; allowing users to see whether the content was shared by someone who has previously had content flagged on a social network; or at the most basic, allowing users to see when was the content first created — for example, when the domain was registered.
My hope is that these new visual cues are created collaboratively, with designers from all the social networks taking advice from social psychologists on the most effective standardised visual flags. As Chris Blow from Meedan argues, we need to think about positive visual cues, rather than simply negative red “debunked” or “fake” stamps on images.
Just after the Paris attacks of November 2015, I wrote a post expressing dismay that while news organizations often published roundup listicles after breaking news events (e.g. “5 hoaxes you shouldn’t have fallen for during the Paris attacks”), this type of work was not being undertaken in realtime on the social platforms themselves. Comments in response to the post pointed me to some of the amazing work happening in France around realtime debunking. If you haven’t seen it (and can speak French!) I would really recommend taking a look at Les Decodeurs, the Verifie Twitter account from Buzzfeed France, and the Instant Redux TV segment on France Info.
BuzzFeed in the U.S. followed this model during the U.S. election, often sharing realtime debunks. During the first debate, when Donald Trump denied that he’d ever said that global warming was created by the Chinese, a photoshopped tweet started doing the rounds saying that the Trump team had deleted a tweet that said exactly that from 2012. That assertion was false and BuzzFeed quickly debunked it on Twitter before the debate had ended.
A question remains whether newsrooms should debunk information on the social web. If they don’t do it for all information, audiences might conclude that something is true if they don’t see the debunk. However, I would argue that during a breaking news story, newsrooms should collaborate around the hoaxes that always do the rounds, whether it’s the pictures of comedian Sam Hyde popping up after active shooting situations, old imagery re-circulating after natural disasters, or people falsely claiming to be victims of an attack looking for media attention. My hope for 2017 is that newsrooms will start to collaborate in realtime on debunking efforts, which will save precious time and resources and free up journalists to guide audiences through the torrent of misinformation that emerges when a news event breaks.
Claire Wardle is former research director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism, now working at First Draft.
Laura Walker Authentic voices, not fake news
Tim Griggs The year we stop taking sides
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
David Chavern Fake news gets solved
Andrew Ramsammy Rise of the rebel journalist
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
Eric Nuzum Podcasting stratifies into hard layers
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
Andy Rossback The year of the user
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
Burt Herman Local news gets interesting
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Lee Glendinning A call for great editing
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Geetika Rudra Journalism is community
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism
Ray Soto VR moves from experiments to immersion
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Matt Waite The people running the media are the problem
Doris Truong Connecting with diverse perspectives
Dhiya Kuriakose The year of digital detoxing
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
Alexis Lloyd Public trust for private realities
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Olivia Ma The year collaboration beats competition
AX Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
Corey Ford The year of the rebelpreneur
Taylor Lorenz “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
Bill Keller A healthy skepticism about data
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
David Weigel A test for online speech
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
Liz Danzico The triumph of the small
Bill Adair The year of the fact-checking bot
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
Sarah Wolozin Virtual reality on the open web
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Mandy Velez The audience is the source and the story
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Tim Herrera The safe space of service journalism
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Richard Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
Cindy Royal Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Andrew Losowsky Building our own communities
Katie Zhu The year of minority media
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Mary Walter-Brown Getting comfortable asking for money
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Tracie Powell Building reader relationships
Cory Haik Navigating power in Trump’s America
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Javaun Moradi What can we own?
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
Ole Reißmann Un-faking the news
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Megan H. Chan Cultural reporting goes mainstream
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
Carrie Brown-Smith We won’t do enough
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Umbreen Bhatti A sense of journalists’ humanity
Molly de Aguiar Philanthropists galvanize around news
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward