Newsrooms will expend enormous resources and effort preparing for Election Night on November 3, 2020. New apps will be built; new interactive maps will premiere; rooms filled with analysts will pour over the incoming data. And there will be a collective sigh of relief late in the night (or more realistically, early the next morning) at having made it through another presidential election.
But I predict the real work will have just begun. Reflections back to 2016 will follow; after the 2016 election, one could hardly go to a journalism conference without hearing about the need for more listening and for more efforts to get out of newsrooms to understand diverse communities. I suspect that 2020 will be characterized by new lessons about the consequences of under-covered and under-served communities, as well as about communities that have lost faith in the news media as an institution. These communities will have fractured, some turning to alternative sources of information, including those that primarily cater to people’s political predispositions. Others will have opted out of what is perceived as an agonizingly long campaign season.
In the week following the election, weary newsrooms will trod out the typical post-mortems: Why did one candidate win and others lose? What do the exit polls tell us? What can be learned from a trip to the most blue and the most red counties? What strategic blunders defined the election?
The aftermath of the election will represent an opportunity for the news media. In this period where the legitimacy of the media (and democracy itself) will be questioned, newsrooms can help the public process what has happened. Did candidates win on the basis of better maneuvering and strategy, illegitimate tactics, or interference? Or did more voters find alignment with particular candidates? Providing the best possible data to answer these questions will help people to process the election in ways that either preserve democracy or raise fundamental questions about the electoral process. Assuming the election is considered largely legitimate (knocking on wood), newsrooms can help to heal communities and bring people together despite the inevitable disappointment that will be felt by many.
By humanizing those with different views, as opposed to focusing on winners making celebratory remarks for example, journalists can promote understanding and (re)build connections within communities. That newsrooms will be able to do this critical post-election work is my aspirational prediction.
Talia Stroud is a professor at the University of Texas and director of the Center for Media Engagement.
Newsrooms will expend enormous resources and effort preparing for Election Night on November 3, 2020. New apps will be built; new interactive maps will premiere; rooms filled with analysts will pour over the incoming data. And there will be a collective sigh of relief late in the night (or more realistically, early the next morning) at having made it through another presidential election.
But I predict the real work will have just begun. Reflections back to 2016 will follow; after the 2016 election, one could hardly go to a journalism conference without hearing about the need for more listening and for more efforts to get out of newsrooms to understand diverse communities. I suspect that 2020 will be characterized by new lessons about the consequences of under-covered and under-served communities, as well as about communities that have lost faith in the news media as an institution. These communities will have fractured, some turning to alternative sources of information, including those that primarily cater to people’s political predispositions. Others will have opted out of what is perceived as an agonizingly long campaign season.
In the week following the election, weary newsrooms will trod out the typical post-mortems: Why did one candidate win and others lose? What do the exit polls tell us? What can be learned from a trip to the most blue and the most red counties? What strategic blunders defined the election?
The aftermath of the election will represent an opportunity for the news media. In this period where the legitimacy of the media (and democracy itself) will be questioned, newsrooms can help the public process what has happened. Did candidates win on the basis of better maneuvering and strategy, illegitimate tactics, or interference? Or did more voters find alignment with particular candidates? Providing the best possible data to answer these questions will help people to process the election in ways that either preserve democracy or raise fundamental questions about the electoral process. Assuming the election is considered largely legitimate (knocking on wood), newsrooms can help to heal communities and bring people together despite the inevitable disappointment that will be felt by many.
By humanizing those with different views, as opposed to focusing on winners making celebratory remarks for example, journalists can promote understanding and (re)build connections within communities. That newsrooms will be able to do this critical post-election work is my aspirational prediction.
Talia Stroud is a professor at the University of Texas and director of the Center for Media Engagement.
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
AX Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Mario García Think small (screen)
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people