It was a different time, the early 2000s. Among the largest and most influential media companies was Knight Ridder — a company many journalists today either don’t know or barely remember.
But some things remain the same. The lack of diversity in newsrooms was a huge, shameful problem — same as today.
Sure, Knight Ridder was famous as a digital innovator — for having the San Jose Mercury News be among the first papers to go online, even launching Mercury Center on AOL back in 1993. But for me one of their biggest innovations was toward the end of its corporate life: a program developed in partnership with the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.
(NAHJ has always been an innovator, too. They were the first ones to create student newsrooms at annual conferences and now leads a freelance-based publication to pay its members to produce journalism, palabra. Not only getting a seat at the table, but building their own table.)
The program I’m talking about debuted in 2003 and I want to see it return. The Parity Project was an investment and a commitment by participating newspapers to strive for a diverse newsroom that reflected the audience it was aiming to serve. It had other elements, like a community-based advisory board, but it was the commitment to diversity based on population data that was key for me.
The Parity Project was based on two things that were around back then and are even more influential now: data and shame. Those are the two things I predict 2021 will bring.
Yes, of course, news orgs that claim a commitment to diversity will continue to publish questionable pieces encouraging military responses to protestors or attacking women for wanting to be called “Doctor”; they’ll continue to hire White males for leadership positions rather than taking the opportunity to hire a qualified candidate of color; they’ll create fellowships that put journalists of color on limited contracts, while outright hiring others with the same experience at entry-level positions; they’ll continue to avoid dealing with their problematic staffer who writes racist, sexist, homophobic, ignorant columns or tweets. (Maybe they’re waiting the staffer to jump to Substack.) I could go on — and that would be the safest prediction to make (though, of course, I’d love to be proved wrong).
But unlike the past, 2021 will also bring a new level of appreciation for data and shame.
At great risk to their careers, we’ve seen journalists rise up and speak out to hold their employer accountable. That’s not new, per se — but to do it on social media, creating shame at an industry level and even building a national awareness is new.
Here at USC, there is an Instagram account called black_at_usc. It’s been a minute since it published, but the collection of anonymous stories amplifying the everyday racism — whether microaggressions or larger issues — offered data and shame. And it was effective. Deans and the university president noticed the account and were forced to address it, prompting changes.
This will happen more. It should happen more. And it will happen across many industries. There is plenty of data, and plenty of shame.
As in the past, leadership will make promises about how this time, this reckoning, is different. And yeah, like you, I have my doubts.
That’s where data and shame come in. Not only do we need to harness data and shame to hold newly elected politicians or those involved in the vaccine deployment accountable — we need to use it to hold ourselves accountable.
Here is what you can do now: Measure the demographics of the audience your organization is aiming to serve and put them up against the demographics of your newsroom. Print it out and hang it up through the newsroom — hell, use it as your Zoom background.
Raise awareness of our shortcomings via data. And shame leadership if they don’t do something about it. And hold leadership accountable when they promise to do something about it, but don’t. Data and shame.
Let’s take a moment to acknowledge that there is a portion of the population that will ignore the data and apparently has no shame. They are a loud and troublesome portion — but they are, in fact, the minority. Chances are your colleagues, your bosses, and your employers aren’t among that fringe group.
But if they are, you know what to do: data and shame.
Robert Hernandez is a professor of professional practice at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.
It was a different time, the early 2000s. Among the largest and most influential media companies was Knight Ridder — a company many journalists today either don’t know or barely remember.
But some things remain the same. The lack of diversity in newsrooms was a huge, shameful problem — same as today.
Sure, Knight Ridder was famous as a digital innovator — for having the San Jose Mercury News be among the first papers to go online, even launching Mercury Center on AOL back in 1993. But for me one of their biggest innovations was toward the end of its corporate life: a program developed in partnership with the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.
(NAHJ has always been an innovator, too. They were the first ones to create student newsrooms at annual conferences and now leads a freelance-based publication to pay its members to produce journalism, palabra. Not only getting a seat at the table, but building their own table.)
The program I’m talking about debuted in 2003 and I want to see it return. The Parity Project was an investment and a commitment by participating newspapers to strive for a diverse newsroom that reflected the audience it was aiming to serve. It had other elements, like a community-based advisory board, but it was the commitment to diversity based on population data that was key for me.
The Parity Project was based on two things that were around back then and are even more influential now: data and shame. Those are the two things I predict 2021 will bring.
Yes, of course, news orgs that claim a commitment to diversity will continue to publish questionable pieces encouraging military responses to protestors or attacking women for wanting to be called “Doctor”; they’ll continue to hire White males for leadership positions rather than taking the opportunity to hire a qualified candidate of color; they’ll create fellowships that put journalists of color on limited contracts, while outright hiring others with the same experience at entry-level positions; they’ll continue to avoid dealing with their problematic staffer who writes racist, sexist, homophobic, ignorant columns or tweets. (Maybe they’re waiting the staffer to jump to Substack.) I could go on — and that would be the safest prediction to make (though, of course, I’d love to be proved wrong).
But unlike the past, 2021 will also bring a new level of appreciation for data and shame.
At great risk to their careers, we’ve seen journalists rise up and speak out to hold their employer accountable. That’s not new, per se — but to do it on social media, creating shame at an industry level and even building a national awareness is new.
Here at USC, there is an Instagram account called black_at_usc. It’s been a minute since it published, but the collection of anonymous stories amplifying the everyday racism — whether microaggressions or larger issues — offered data and shame. And it was effective. Deans and the university president noticed the account and were forced to address it, prompting changes.
This will happen more. It should happen more. And it will happen across many industries. There is plenty of data, and plenty of shame.
As in the past, leadership will make promises about how this time, this reckoning, is different. And yeah, like you, I have my doubts.
That’s where data and shame come in. Not only do we need to harness data and shame to hold newly elected politicians or those involved in the vaccine deployment accountable — we need to use it to hold ourselves accountable.
Here is what you can do now: Measure the demographics of the audience your organization is aiming to serve and put them up against the demographics of your newsroom. Print it out and hang it up through the newsroom — hell, use it as your Zoom background.
Raise awareness of our shortcomings via data. And shame leadership if they don’t do something about it. And hold leadership accountable when they promise to do something about it, but don’t. Data and shame.
Let’s take a moment to acknowledge that there is a portion of the population that will ignore the data and apparently has no shame. They are a loud and troublesome portion — but they are, in fact, the minority. Chances are your colleagues, your bosses, and your employers aren’t among that fringe group.
But if they are, you know what to do: data and shame.
Robert Hernandez is a professor of professional practice at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
Don Day Business first, journalism second
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Alyssa Zeisler Holistic medicine for journalism
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
Nico Gendron Ask your readers to help build your products
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
AX Mina 2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
Ernie Smith Entrepreneurship on rails
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
Matt Skibinski Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Kerri Hoffman Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
Jacqué Palmer The rise of the plain-text email newsletter
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, a push for pluralism
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Megan McCarthy Readers embrace a low-information diet
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
Steve Henn Has independent podcasting peaked?
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Julia Angwin Show your (computational) work
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
John Davidow Reflect and repent
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
Tamar Charney Public radio has a midlife crisis
Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin Media reparations now
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
Sarah Marshall The year audiences need extra cheer
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Chicas Poderosas More voices mean better information
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Charo Henríquez A new path to leadership
Rachel Schallom The rise of nonprofit journalism continues
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves