A market of one used to be the dream of marketers around the world. Digital platforms made it come true through what is now known as mass personalization: the automated process of hyper-fragmenting consumers and predicting their needs or desires based on massive data surveillance and classification technologies. Businesses report a significant increase in sales when they use personalized marketing technologies, and political campaigners seem happy to spend money on targeted advertising.
Mass personalized consumption of goods, services, and messages has now become a reality. However, policymakers around the world have had a more radical dream: a society of one.
Such a dream requires a much deeper kind of mass personalization, beyond messages, goods, and services. A society of one means the mass personalization of truth.
There is a reason I’m using the word “truth” instead of “reality.” Truth, in this sense, is a reality that is not just cognitive or private, but also sensory or material, as well as public or shared, and thereby social. Our realities deal with what we eat or read or watch, but our truths deal with our gut feelings about how we and things are or should be. If reality is about cognitive experiences, truth is about affective meanings.
The filter bubble is a now discredited theory on mass personalization of reality which claims that digital platforms enclose us in cognitive cocoons. But evidence shows that people’s beliefs have little to do with their level of exposure to difference or dissent. Quite the opposite: People don’t just expose themselves to very different ideas and messages, perhaps out of curiosity, but are much more open to some of them than we assume.
Mass personalization of truth is where both our bodies and minds are affected by automated technologies of prediction and fragmentation. It is not just about listening to your weekly Spotify-curated playlist, but about listening to it through earbuds which in effect privatize our sensory and bodily experience, even in public spaces such as public transit. It’s not only about where Google Maps suggests we get a coffee, but also the route we should take to get there; it’s not only about showing you anti-smoking ads on Facebook, it’s about raising your private health insurance premium.
The implications of the mass personalization of truth are immense. It affects notions of trust, justice, and autonomy. When we live by personalized truths, our shared trust in social institutions such as science, education, or law erodes. When there is no public space for shared truths to emerge, how do we even know whether we are treated fairly by police, courts, or our employers? Moreover, when social systems can ever more accurately anticipate our life expectancy, health costs, level of education, or economic productivity, why would states or corporations abide by any universal allocation of resources, equal rights, or ethics of care? And how can any notion of democracy be imagined without autonomous citizens?
A society of one may, in 2021, sound like an impossible dream (or nightmare, depending on who you are) — but so was a market of one before the emergence of giant digital platforms. The real threat of mass personalization is not to our minds, but to our embodied truths.
Hossein Derakhshan is a London-based media researcher and former research fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center.
A market of one used to be the dream of marketers around the world. Digital platforms made it come true through what is now known as mass personalization: the automated process of hyper-fragmenting consumers and predicting their needs or desires based on massive data surveillance and classification technologies. Businesses report a significant increase in sales when they use personalized marketing technologies, and political campaigners seem happy to spend money on targeted advertising.
Mass personalized consumption of goods, services, and messages has now become a reality. However, policymakers around the world have had a more radical dream: a society of one.
Such a dream requires a much deeper kind of mass personalization, beyond messages, goods, and services. A society of one means the mass personalization of truth.
There is a reason I’m using the word “truth” instead of “reality.” Truth, in this sense, is a reality that is not just cognitive or private, but also sensory or material, as well as public or shared, and thereby social. Our realities deal with what we eat or read or watch, but our truths deal with our gut feelings about how we and things are or should be. If reality is about cognitive experiences, truth is about affective meanings.
The filter bubble is a now discredited theory on mass personalization of reality which claims that digital platforms enclose us in cognitive cocoons. But evidence shows that people’s beliefs have little to do with their level of exposure to difference or dissent. Quite the opposite: People don’t just expose themselves to very different ideas and messages, perhaps out of curiosity, but are much more open to some of them than we assume.
Mass personalization of truth is where both our bodies and minds are affected by automated technologies of prediction and fragmentation. It is not just about listening to your weekly Spotify-curated playlist, but about listening to it through earbuds which in effect privatize our sensory and bodily experience, even in public spaces such as public transit. It’s not only about where Google Maps suggests we get a coffee, but also the route we should take to get there; it’s not only about showing you anti-smoking ads on Facebook, it’s about raising your private health insurance premium.
The implications of the mass personalization of truth are immense. It affects notions of trust, justice, and autonomy. When we live by personalized truths, our shared trust in social institutions such as science, education, or law erodes. When there is no public space for shared truths to emerge, how do we even know whether we are treated fairly by police, courts, or our employers? Moreover, when social systems can ever more accurately anticipate our life expectancy, health costs, level of education, or economic productivity, why would states or corporations abide by any universal allocation of resources, equal rights, or ethics of care? And how can any notion of democracy be imagined without autonomous citizens?
A society of one may, in 2021, sound like an impossible dream (or nightmare, depending on who you are) — but so was a market of one before the emergence of giant digital platforms. The real threat of mass personalization is not to our minds, but to our embodied truths.
Hossein Derakhshan is a London-based media researcher and former research fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center.
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, a push for pluralism
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Julia Angwin Show your (computational) work
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
Alyssa Zeisler Holistic medicine for journalism
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change
Nico Gendron Ask your readers to help build your products
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
AX Mina 2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin Media reparations now
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
Sarah Marshall The year audiences need extra cheer
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli Defund the crime beat
Don Day Business first, journalism second
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
John Davidow Reflect and repent
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
Jacqué Palmer The rise of the plain-text email newsletter
Kerri Hoffman Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Charo Henríquez A new path to leadership
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
Matt Skibinski Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture
Megan McCarthy Readers embrace a low-information diet
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Rachel Schallom The rise of nonprofit journalism continues
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
Beena Raghavendran Journalism gets fused with art
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
Tamar Charney Public radio has a midlife crisis
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
Chicas Poderosas More voices mean better information
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse