What’s the future of journalism? It’s a fragile future, one that needs us to solve a crisis of lack of trust. Too many of us don’t watch or read the news anymore. In fact, we don’t trust it.
But would you trust someone if they were dispassionately observing from a distance while your rights were being stripped away? While your own future was being determined without your input? Would you trust them as a credible source of information if they thought there were two sides to whether you deserve your safety, humanity, and dignity? If your voice or experience was not reflected? Or, conversely, if they kept shouting about how everything was broken and bad without offering any solutions or support — so much so that you were left with a compounding sense of despair and helplessness?
Wouldn’t you turn elsewhere? To some source that offered you hope, a sense of belonging, the potential understanding and agency to make an impact in these tough times? A place that left you feeling less alone, maybe even cautiously hopeful?
This is the reality our industry faces. Because the headlines aren’t just things that happen elsewhere and to other people — they’re how we live our lives.
It’s time for journalism to change our approach. We work for our communities: our followers, listeners, viewers, and readers. And it’s time we started listening to them, putting them at the center of everything we do and make from the very beginning.
Because that’s the first step to understanding what’s missing, and what our communities — what we all — need from journalism.
For digital and social publishers, audience conversations often come at the end of the process — they’re numbers and metrics that determine our level of success or failure, but too rarely insights that inform our path into the future.
Here at Freeda, it’s a practice we’ve built into our foundations. We’re constantly consulting our community. We know that we can’t reflect our community, engage them, or earn their trust, if we don’t invest in understanding them. For us, the learnings are multi-layered: times are tough; young people are tired, scared, anxious. The news is dire, they don’t feel — and aren’t — reflected enough in coverage.
Add to that the fact that most spend so much of their lives on social platforms — it’s where they engage with each other and with news. These platforms contain so much promise for creativity and connection, but the reality is that algorithms are biased, the attention economy often prioritizes outrage, and social platforms have been linked to having a harmful impact on mental health.
It’s a reality I’m definitely familiar with as a user, and I’m guessing many of you are too. It’s so rare to look up from my phone after a period of scrolling and feel anything but a little empty, outraged, or bleak.
For us, this has meant building an approach that keeps our community and their needs at the center of our entire process. So in addition to interrogating every story’s journalistic merits, we also ask who it centers and how it leaves someone feeling. Can we leave people with a sense of belonging? A sense of purpose or of wonder? A sense of agency even in the face of systemic problems?
So I’ll leave you with a question that’s my north star: What would the future of journalism look like, if we built not just for our communities, but also with them?
Masuma Ahuja is head of content for Freeda English, a European social publisher.
What’s the future of journalism? It’s a fragile future, one that needs us to solve a crisis of lack of trust. Too many of us don’t watch or read the news anymore. In fact, we don’t trust it.
But would you trust someone if they were dispassionately observing from a distance while your rights were being stripped away? While your own future was being determined without your input? Would you trust them as a credible source of information if they thought there were two sides to whether you deserve your safety, humanity, and dignity? If your voice or experience was not reflected? Or, conversely, if they kept shouting about how everything was broken and bad without offering any solutions or support — so much so that you were left with a compounding sense of despair and helplessness?
Wouldn’t you turn elsewhere? To some source that offered you hope, a sense of belonging, the potential understanding and agency to make an impact in these tough times? A place that left you feeling less alone, maybe even cautiously hopeful?
This is the reality our industry faces. Because the headlines aren’t just things that happen elsewhere and to other people — they’re how we live our lives.
It’s time for journalism to change our approach. We work for our communities: our followers, listeners, viewers, and readers. And it’s time we started listening to them, putting them at the center of everything we do and make from the very beginning.
Because that’s the first step to understanding what’s missing, and what our communities — what we all — need from journalism.
For digital and social publishers, audience conversations often come at the end of the process — they’re numbers and metrics that determine our level of success or failure, but too rarely insights that inform our path into the future.
Here at Freeda, it’s a practice we’ve built into our foundations. We’re constantly consulting our community. We know that we can’t reflect our community, engage them, or earn their trust, if we don’t invest in understanding them. For us, the learnings are multi-layered: times are tough; young people are tired, scared, anxious. The news is dire, they don’t feel — and aren’t — reflected enough in coverage.
Add to that the fact that most spend so much of their lives on social platforms — it’s where they engage with each other and with news. These platforms contain so much promise for creativity and connection, but the reality is that algorithms are biased, the attention economy often prioritizes outrage, and social platforms have been linked to having a harmful impact on mental health.
It’s a reality I’m definitely familiar with as a user, and I’m guessing many of you are too. It’s so rare to look up from my phone after a period of scrolling and feel anything but a little empty, outraged, or bleak.
For us, this has meant building an approach that keeps our community and their needs at the center of our entire process. So in addition to interrogating every story’s journalistic merits, we also ask who it centers and how it leaves someone feeling. Can we leave people with a sense of belonging? A sense of purpose or of wonder? A sense of agency even in the face of systemic problems?
So I’ll leave you with a question that’s my north star: What would the future of journalism look like, if we built not just for our communities, but also with them?
Masuma Ahuja is head of content for Freeda English, a European social publisher.
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
James Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Nik Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly