Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
What audiences really want: For journalists to connect with them as people
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Nov. 7, 2024, 12:44 p.m.
Aggregation & Discovery

Google Search may not get a lot of love these days, but a niche Chrome extension launched in March — Google Scholar PDF Reader — counts 500,000 users who leave largely positive reviews : “A revolutionary game changer. Considering naming my first-born child after this chrome extension.”

Google’s promise with the launch of the extension was to “supercharge your PDF reading” by making it easier for academics (or anyone else) to read research paper PDFs — turning all citations into links and giving the ability to jump quickly between sections via an automated table of contents, for instance.

This week, Google updated the extension with AI outlines, intended to help “researchers everywhere read all that is on their pending paper piles quickly and thoroughly.” The outlines appear in a sidebar alongside the PDF, and you can skim them or, in Google’s words, “click on a bullet to deep read where it gets interesting.” Here’s what it looks like when I tested it on a preprint, “The Consumption of Pink Slime Journalism: Who, What, When, Where, and Why?

I found the feature to be less about AI summarization, more about easier navigation and getting to the parts of a paper most relevant to you. Some disagree. You can see what you think by testing it here.

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
What audiences really want: For journalists to connect with them as people
Plus: How newsrooms are using generative AI, what makes news seem authentic on social media, and how to bridge the divide between academics and journalists.
When the winner’s name isn’t enough: How the AP is leaning into explanatory journalism to call races
“We’ve learned, especially in the last few cycles, that it’s not necessarily possible or a good idea to let [the electoral] process play out in silence.”
Votebeat assembles nearly 100 election experts to answer reporters’ questions (now, and in the weeks ahead)
“The problem with voting stories is that the people who make themselves most available don’t know what the hell they’re talking about.”