Yesterday, The New York Times came out with another impressive digital narrative package for a sports story: Tomato Can Blues.. It combines lush illustrations and audio narration and reads like a graphic novel come to life. You might even say it’s sort of like…nah, let’s keep the “S” word out of it as long as we can.
But for all its beauty and richness, just like its avalanche-themed forebear, Tomato Can Blues debuted with boring ads. Specifically, a couple of standard banner ads — which appeared last night to be coming from ad networks, no less — looking a little out of place in the otherwise carefully laid out piece.
The NYT’s Tomato Can Blues is lovely and polished http://t.co/tZjTK0JDNA but are those boring old standard banner ads again ugh
— Joshua Benton (@jbenton) September 19, 2013
The same boring Google network ads that chase me around the web shouldn’t chase me through beautiful big-ticket multimedia NYT blowouts.
— Joshua Benton (@jbenton) September 19, 2013
But why does the NYT commission both illustrations and a Bobby Cannavale narration & not sell ads against it? http://t.co/8leu16clPb +
— Robinson Meyer (@yayitsrob) September 18, 2013
Snow Fall (yeah, sorry) was dinged for the same problem — the ad-side creativity not matching the edit-side creativity. And if you look at the code for the ad units on Tomato Can Blues, the url in the iframe is http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/multimedia/bundles/projects/2012/AvalancheDeploy/avalanche_ad_leaderboard.html — which, as you might gather from the address, is the exact same ad unit as in Snow Fall.
The unimaginative ads also seemed odd given that the Times seemed to have fixed this problem with one of its other recent multimedia sports narrative projects, The Jockey. Throughout that multipart story, you’ll see custom ad units from BMW. As Ad Age wrote at the time:
“Snow Fall” carried standard ad units that were not custom built for the story, clunky additions to a slick feature. After its publication, the Times’ business side said it planned to work with advertisers on custom ads for these types of stories in the future.
“This time, we learned from our mistakes,” said Tracy Quitasol, executive director of the Times Idea Lab, which designed ads in “The Jockey” promoting BMW…
Ms. Quitasol said the Times approached several companies about advertising in “The Jockey.” BMW signed on and was kept in the dark about certain elements of the story: The company didn’t initially know when it would be published, what it would look like, or even exactly how the ads would render, according to Ms. Quitasol.
“It’s brave and shows a trust for our brand,” said Ms. Quitasol.
When I reached out to the Times to see if someone could talk to me about the ad treatment in Tomato Can Blues, the paper declined to offer its staffers for an interview. Spokeswoman Linda Zebian did say over email: “We have a new head of advertising [Meredith Levien] and making sure the ads on these big multimedia projects is on the same level of the editorial is something that is on her agenda.”
Oddly, some time between that email and this story’s posting, all the ads on Tomato Can Blues seem to have disappeared, at least on our computers.
25 comments:
Guys, do you even Adblock?
The ad issue is a symptom of legacy ‘newsroom think’: let’s do something cool and not tell anyone – even in our own company – about it. And then we’ll reap the rewards of our effort, although not necessarily monetary rewards. And then we’ll blame for the sales team for not hitting their numbers because that’s clearly not an organizational issue, it’s just a sales issue.
Dear newsroom leadership: abre los ojos.
IuVNgWqowSFYRLj
fJkgHGlZFWhIL
hSmxcGqTQfBaeMDY
QJmRYWDCKysxZn
HdOFGeraCI
UvxaEdCiJBo
SMERrexXuyBGJO
UxpdvTKqQeamu
mnhVSTXl
dSPCjTZO
QBGtKriYwSeN
KosCGxJOcn
ewUyJCWL
LcAWqTbYCow
eHkSQlNpyKqz
lqWkaDZSRoKcjh
LOglzGrJNM
THvslXBGmzW
njKThPvDZeCE
BHTXayVndkhRiQgY
QjNmFpPTASof
nlhIoHdVQAx
vekhjgrtRGnFfLo
Trackbacks:
Leave a comment