“‘Informing democracy’ is not enough in an age of rampant lies about elections and public health and climate. Fact-checkers need to be more assertive in getting truthful information to the audience that needs it.”
“In campaigns around the country, there will be fewer exaggerations and falsehoods. Politicians will try to out-do each other by bragging about their good records for Pinocchios and Truth-O-Meter ratings.”
“People have long mused about live fact-checking on television, but this marked the first in-depth study. It revealed our product could have tremendous appeal — but we need to explain it better to our users.”
“Candidates will ignore a lot of the truth-squadding — except when they can use it to attack their opponents. (Politicians hate fact-checking, except when they love it!)”
What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
Adair, Bill. "Pants, burning." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 17 Dec. 2015. Web. 19 Oct. 2024.
APA
Adair, B. (2015, Dec. 17). Pants, burning. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved October 19, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/12/pants-burning/
Chicago
Adair, Bill. "Pants, burning." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified December 17, 2015. Accessed October 19, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/12/pants-burning/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/12/pants-burning/
| title = Pants, burning
| last = Adair
| first = Bill
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 17 December 2015
| accessdate = 19 October 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Adair|2015}}
}}