John Wihbey is assistant director for Journalist’s Resource at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy. He is also a lecturer in journalism at Boston University. He has reported for the Star-Ledger in New Jersey and worked at WBUR-Boston, where he was a producer and digital editor for the NPR show “On Point with Tom Ashbrook.”
Only 25 percent of journalists surveyed said they were “very” well equipped to interpret statistics from sources, and only 11 percent said the same about doing statistical analysis themselves.
We sift through the academic journals so you don’t have to. Here are 10 of the most interesting studies about social and digital media published in 2015.
Journalist’s Resource sifts through the academic journals so you don’t have to. Here are 12 of the studies about social and digital media they found most interesting in 2014.
The impact of Do Not Track on news outlets and the complexities of filter bubbles and polarization: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
How “bridging elites” help on Twitter, perceptions of news by a skeptical public, and Wikipedia pages as newsmaking destinations: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
When journalists factcheck politicians (or don’t), how to flag bad behavior on social media, and getting past slactivism: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
Crowdsourcing tiny snippets of time, building the news around analytics, and how Twitter is weird during big news events: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
How the web is playing out for local TV reporters, measuring customer satisfaction with paywalls, and how reporters think about comments: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
Predicting what goes viral, sourcing the Arab Spring, and Twitter in power vs. out of power: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
Guessing the location of tweets without geolocation, tracking who’ll pay for online news, and the conditions that encourage learning on Facebook: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
Wihbey, John. "What’s New in Digital and Social Media Research: What happens when robot journalists produce stories that are “good enough”." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 3 Mar. 2014. Web. 12 Dec. 2024.
APA
Wihbey, J. (2014, Mar. 3). What’s New in Digital and Social Media Research: What happens when robot journalists produce stories that are “good enough”. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved December 12, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/03/whats-new-in-digital-and-social-media-research-what-happens-when-robot-journalists-produce-stories-that-are-good-enough/
Chicago
Wihbey, John. "What’s New in Digital and Social Media Research: What happens when robot journalists produce stories that are “good enough”." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified March 3, 2014. Accessed December 12, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/03/whats-new-in-digital-and-social-media-research-what-happens-when-robot-journalists-produce-stories-that-are-good-enough/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/03/whats-new-in-digital-and-social-media-research-what-happens-when-robot-journalists-produce-stories-that-are-good-enough/
| title = What’s New in Digital and Social Media Research: What happens when robot journalists produce stories that are “good enough”
| last = Wihbey
| first = John
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 3 March 2014
| accessdate = 12 December 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Wihbey|2014}}
}}
