We keep an eye out for the most interesting stories about Labby subjects: digital media, startups, the web, journalism, strategy, and more. Here’s some of what we’ve seen lately.
Alan Dershowitz “was introduced as a ‘constitutional lawyer’ to provide analysis on the verdict — and his connection with Epstein and Ms Giuffre was not made clear in the interview.” —
, . "The BBC acknowledged it probably shouldn’t have had Jeffrey Epstein’s former lawyer on as an impartial analyst on Ghislaine Maxwell." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 3 Jan. 2022. Web. 16 Nov. 2024.
APA
, . (2022, Jan. 3). The BBC acknowledged it probably shouldn’t have had Jeffrey Epstein’s former lawyer on as an impartial analyst on Ghislaine Maxwell. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved November 16, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/reading/the-bbc-acknowledged-it-probably-shouldnt-have-had-jeffrey-epsteins-former-lawyer-on-as-an-impartial-analyst-on-ghislaine-maxwell/
Chicago
, . "The BBC acknowledged it probably shouldn’t have had Jeffrey Epstein’s former lawyer on as an impartial analyst on Ghislaine Maxwell." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified January 3, 2022. Accessed November 16, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/reading/the-bbc-acknowledged-it-probably-shouldnt-have-had-jeffrey-epsteins-former-lawyer-on-as-an-impartial-analyst-on-ghislaine-maxwell/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/reading/the-bbc-acknowledged-it-probably-shouldnt-have-had-jeffrey-epsteins-former-lawyer-on-as-an-impartial-analyst-on-ghislaine-maxwell/
| title = The BBC acknowledged it probably shouldn’t have had Jeffrey Epstein’s former lawyer on as an impartial analyst on Ghislaine Maxwell
| last =
| first =
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 3 January 2022
| accessdate = 16 November 2024
| ref = {{harvid||2022}}
}}
