, . "The BBC acknowledged it probably shouldn’t have had Jeffrey Epstein’s former lawyer on as an impartial analyst on Ghislaine Maxwell." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 3 Jan. 2022. Web. 16 Nov. 2024.
APA
, . (2022, Jan. 3). The BBC acknowledged it probably shouldn’t have had Jeffrey Epstein’s former lawyer on as an impartial analyst on Ghislaine Maxwell. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved November 16, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/reading/the-bbc-acknowledged-it-probably-shouldnt-have-had-jeffrey-epsteins-former-lawyer-on-as-an-impartial-analyst-on-ghislaine-maxwell/
Chicago
, . "The BBC acknowledged it probably shouldn’t have had Jeffrey Epstein’s former lawyer on as an impartial analyst on Ghislaine Maxwell." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified January 3, 2022. Accessed November 16, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/reading/the-bbc-acknowledged-it-probably-shouldnt-have-had-jeffrey-epsteins-former-lawyer-on-as-an-impartial-analyst-on-ghislaine-maxwell/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/reading/the-bbc-acknowledged-it-probably-shouldnt-have-had-jeffrey-epsteins-former-lawyer-on-as-an-impartial-analyst-on-ghislaine-maxwell/
| title = The BBC acknowledged it probably shouldn’t have had Jeffrey Epstein’s former lawyer on as an impartial analyst on Ghislaine Maxwell
| last =
| first =
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 3 January 2022
| accessdate = 16 November 2024
| ref = {{harvid||2022}}
}}
