“‘Informing democracy’ is not enough in an age of rampant lies about elections and public health and climate. Fact-checkers need to be more assertive in getting truthful information to the audience that needs it.” Bill Adair
“We’ve found that artificial Intelligence is smart, but it’s not yet smart enough to make final decisions or avoid the robotic repetition that is an unfortunate trait of, um, robots.”
“People have long mused about live fact-checking on television, but this marked the first in-depth study. It revealed our product could have tremendous appeal — but we need to explain it better to our users.”
“The key to the future of fact-checking is getting the fact-checks virtually instant and making it so the fact-check is presented on the medium that the claim is made on.”
Walk-Morris, Tatiana. "From Nieman Reports: The future of political fact-checking." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 15 Apr. 2016. Web. 19 Oct. 2024.
APA
Walk-Morris, T. (2016, Apr. 15). From Nieman Reports: The future of political fact-checking. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved October 19, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/04/from-nieman-reports-the-future-of-political-fact-checking/
Chicago
Walk-Morris, Tatiana. "From Nieman Reports: The future of political fact-checking." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified April 15, 2016. Accessed October 19, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/04/from-nieman-reports-the-future-of-political-fact-checking/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/04/from-nieman-reports-the-future-of-political-fact-checking/
| title = From Nieman Reports: The future of political fact-checking
| last = Walk-Morris
| first = Tatiana
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 15 April 2016
| accessdate = 19 October 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Walk-Morris|2016}}
}}