Plus: iHeartRadio digs deeper into on-demand audio, Gimlet deals with another cancellation, and even a small public radio station is finding success in true-crime podcasts.
Plus: What new and returning shows to expect in the new year, Panoply launches an “imprint,” and a liberal podcast network tries to counterbalance conservative talk radio.
Quah, Nicholas. "Hot Pod: Did the election podcast glut of 2016 fail its listeners?." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 15 Nov. 2016. Web. 11 Dec. 2024.
APA
Quah, N. (2016, Nov. 15). Hot Pod: Did the election podcast glut of 2016 fail its listeners?. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved December 11, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/11/hot-pod-did-the-election-podcast-glut-of-2016-fail-its-listeners/
Chicago
Quah, Nicholas. "Hot Pod: Did the election podcast glut of 2016 fail its listeners?." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified November 15, 2016. Accessed December 11, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/11/hot-pod-did-the-election-podcast-glut-of-2016-fail-its-listeners/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/11/hot-pod-did-the-election-podcast-glut-of-2016-fail-its-listeners/
| title = Hot Pod: Did the election podcast glut of 2016 fail its listeners?
| last = Quah
| first = Nicholas
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 15 November 2016
| accessdate = 11 December 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Quah|2016}}
}}
