Including better support for paywalled sites, richer ad formats, and ways for publishers to direct readers elsewhere on their site from within an AMP article.
Only a small subset of news organizations currently use HTTPS to secure their connections to readers, but a variety of incentives — from Google’s search rules to browser makers’ policies — are pushing them in that direction.
What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
Wang, Shan. "S is for “secure”: Why news organizations are ditching (or should ditch) HTTP for HTTPS." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 13 Jul. 2015. Web. 16 Nov. 2024.
APA
Wang, S. (2015, Jul. 13). S is for “secure”: Why news organizations are ditching (or should ditch) HTTP for HTTPS. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved November 16, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/07/s-is-for-secure-why-news-organizations-are-ditching-or-should-ditch-http-for-https/
Chicago
Wang, Shan. "S is for “secure”: Why news organizations are ditching (or should ditch) HTTP for HTTPS." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified July 13, 2015. Accessed November 16, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/07/s-is-for-secure-why-news-organizations-are-ditching-or-should-ditch-http-for-https/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/07/s-is-for-secure-why-news-organizations-are-ditching-or-should-ditch-http-for-https/
| title = S is for “secure”: Why news organizations are ditching (or should ditch) HTTP for HTTPS
| last = Wang
| first = Shan
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 13 July 2015
| accessdate = 16 November 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Wang|2015}}
}}
