“I think the value of our paper is to tell researchers that you can use The New York Times, but you need to realize The New York Times is representative of itself.”
“In our ‘news’ today we can see the tattler, the party pamphlet, the recondite journal of opinion, the yellow rag, the journal of commerce, the sob sister, the literary journal, and the progressive muckraker.”
What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
Tworek and John Maxwell Hamilton, Heidi. "Why the “golden age” of newspapers was the exception, not the rule." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 2 May. 2018. Web. 18 Mar. 2025.
APA
Tworek and John Maxwell Hamilton, H. (2018, May. 2). Why the “golden age” of newspapers was the exception, not the rule. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved March 18, 2025, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/05/why-the-golden-age-of-newspapers-was-the-exception-not-the-rule/
Chicago
Tworek and John Maxwell Hamilton, Heidi. "Why the “golden age” of newspapers was the exception, not the rule." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified May 2, 2018. Accessed March 18, 2025. https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/05/why-the-golden-age-of-newspapers-was-the-exception-not-the-rule/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/05/why-the-golden-age-of-newspapers-was-the-exception-not-the-rule/
| title = Why the “golden age” of newspapers was the exception, not the rule
| last = Tworek and John Maxwell Hamilton
| first = Heidi
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 2 May 2018
| accessdate = 18 March 2025
| ref = {{harvid|Tworek and John Maxwell Hamilton|2018}}
}}
