Getting revenue directly from listeners is not an immediate priority for most podcast companies. But when payment does arrive, will the money go mostly to producers, networks, or platforms? Part 3 of a five-part series on the business of on-demand audio.
Podcasts have benefited from the unique intimacy of its ads. Can that strength survive the rise of programmatic and dynamic ad insertion? Part 2 of a five-part series on the business of on-demand audio.
Podcasting’s biggest players put on a dog and pony show for advertisers. Plus: More details on The New York Times’ audio push, Starbucks gets in the game, and Questlove reads ads.
Quah, Nicholas. "Hot Pod: Is the Stitcher deal a step toward a closed podcast ecosystem?." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 7 Jun. 2016. Web. 18 Oct. 2024.
APA
Quah, N. (2016, Jun. 7). Hot Pod: Is the Stitcher deal a step toward a closed podcast ecosystem?. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved October 18, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/06/hot-pod-is-the-stitcher-deal-a-step-toward-a-closed-podcast-ecosystem/
Chicago
Quah, Nicholas. "Hot Pod: Is the Stitcher deal a step toward a closed podcast ecosystem?." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified June 7, 2016. Accessed October 18, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/06/hot-pod-is-the-stitcher-deal-a-step-toward-a-closed-podcast-ecosystem/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/06/hot-pod-is-the-stitcher-deal-a-step-toward-a-closed-podcast-ecosystem/
| title = Hot Pod: Is the Stitcher deal a step toward a closed podcast ecosystem?
| last = Quah
| first = Nicholas
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 7 June 2016
| accessdate = 18 October 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Quah|2016}}
}}
