When one news publisher has a story about something bad — a disaster, a death, or just general terribleness — other publishers move more quickly to match it than they do with good news.
“We’re always navigating information and culture by way of these mechanisms, and every mechanism has a built in notion of what it’s trying to accomplish.”
What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
O'Donovan, Caroline. "Q&A: Tarleton Gillespie says algorithms may be new, but editorial calculations aren’t." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 8 Jul. 2014. Web. 14 Dec. 2024.
APA
O'Donovan, C. (2014, Jul. 8). Q&A: Tarleton Gillespie says algorithms may be new, but editorial calculations aren’t. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved December 14, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/07/qa-tarleton-gillespie-says-algorithms-may-be-new-but-editorial-calculations-arent/
Chicago
O'Donovan, Caroline. "Q&A: Tarleton Gillespie says algorithms may be new, but editorial calculations aren’t." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified July 8, 2014. Accessed December 14, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/07/qa-tarleton-gillespie-says-algorithms-may-be-new-but-editorial-calculations-arent/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/07/qa-tarleton-gillespie-says-algorithms-may-be-new-but-editorial-calculations-arent/
| title = Q&A: Tarleton Gillespie says algorithms may be new, but editorial calculations aren’t
| last = O'Donovan
| first = Caroline
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 8 July 2014
| accessdate = 14 December 2024
| ref = {{harvid|O'Donovan|2014}}
}}
