From nasal New York accents to vocal fry, NPR’s anchors and reporters have long inflamed debates about whose voices should represent the nation — or just be heard by it.
Jeffrey Toobin, Nina Totenberg, and Lyle Denniston talk about covering the Supreme Court, where the rise of documents and specialization have altered how legal stories get told.
What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
LaFrance, Adrienne. "Still no cameras allowed, but Supreme Court coverage has changed more than you think." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 4 Apr. 2012. Web. 24 Nov. 2024.
APA
LaFrance, A. (2012, Apr. 4). Still no cameras allowed, but Supreme Court coverage has changed more than you think. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved November 24, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2012/04/still-no-cameras-allowed-but-supreme-court-coverage-has-changed-more-than-you-think/
Chicago
LaFrance, Adrienne. "Still no cameras allowed, but Supreme Court coverage has changed more than you think." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified April 4, 2012. Accessed November 24, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2012/04/still-no-cameras-allowed-but-supreme-court-coverage-has-changed-more-than-you-think/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2012/04/still-no-cameras-allowed-but-supreme-court-coverage-has-changed-more-than-you-think/
| title = Still no cameras allowed, but Supreme Court coverage has changed more than you think
| last = LaFrance
| first = Adrienne
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 4 April 2012
| accessdate = 24 November 2024
| ref = {{harvid|LaFrance|2012}}
}}
